Transportation Experts Challenge Purpose of Red Light Cameras

Reported by: Jeff Beimfohr
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 4/25/2012 8:35 am
MEMPHIS, TN (abc24.com) - The controversy over red light cameras continues to rage. In Missouri, one St. Louis judge ruled they were invalid, while another ruled the opposite.

Several transportation experts recently weighed in with their thoughts.

Chad Dornsifer of the Best Highway Safety Practices Institute bills himself as one of the top experts in the nation when is comes to assessing the usage of red light cameras. And if it were up to him, red light cameras would get a stop sign.

“Essentially what we have is unsafe practices being monetized by our government,” Dornsifer told abc24.com.

Twenty four states and the District of Columbia currently use red light cameras.

“The United States Department of Transportation and the states are conspiring to make it a civil crime so they can eliminate due process,” Dornsifer said.

So, what about the ongoing “money vs. safety” issue?

“Not a single state that has ever adopted cameras has shown a safety improvement,” said Dornsifer, “the sole purpose is money.”

Dornsifer maintains safety can be improved with engineering, and adds, “If they’ve chose cameras, then the safety of the people is not the issue.”

Red light cameras are not used everywhere in the Mid-South. Cameras can be found in Arkansas, but with a twist drivers might like.

“We do have them,” said David Nilles of the Arkansas Department of Transportation, “but we do not use them for issuing tickets. They are basically there to monitor movement of traffic.”

In Mississippi, they aren’t there at all.

“The thing about the state law in Mississippi,” said Wes Dean, a traffic engineer for the Mississippi Department of Transportation, “an officer has to visually see an infraction taking place.”

If you’re still wavering on the money vs. safety issue, here’s a parting shot from one of the experts.

“We sit here naively believing our court system is all about justice,” Dornsifer told abc24.com, “when in fact, most traffic courts live wholly off the income of tickets.”

Dornsifer also said that over the three years there has been a 25 percent reduction in accidents simply because of the economy.

So, unless municipalities can prove red light cameras generate more than 25% less accidents, their money is gone in the time it takes the camera to flash.
Share
2 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of abc24 News

jcwconsult - 4/26/2012 5:20 PM
0 Votes
MphsMark is on the right track. There are good formulas to time BOTH the yellow intervals to allow enough time for people to stop, and the all-red intervals to clear the intersections before cross traffic can arrive. The key is to time the lights for the ACTUAL speeds of traffic, NOT for a posted speed limit arbitrarily set way below the actual traffic speeds. If these formulas are followed properly, there will not be enough straight through violations for the fines to even pay the basic costs of operating the cameras, let alone make any real profits. Unfortunately, engineering for maximum safety is not profitable, so many cities prefer to deliberately mis-engineer their lights, deliberately cause more red violations that would not happen with proper engineering, put up cameras, and "pick the pockets" of hundreds of safe drivers. See our website for the science and maybe you will join us to help get red light camera cash registers banned in every state, as they are in many states already. James C. Walker, National Motorists Association, www.motorists.org, Ann Arbor, MI

MphsMark - 4/25/2012 10:39 AM
2 Votes
Think about this for a minute-- If public safety was the REAL goal, then why not program a 3 second delay before the opposing light turns green? That would allow the intersection to clear before traffic resumes. All red light cameras do is either make people speed up to get through the intersection, or slam on the brakes in an attempt to stop in time- both to avoid the fine imposed by the camera. No.. the truth of the matter is all the municipalities are really interested in is more revenue. Period. Anyone who says different is lying.. but then, they ARE politicians.
More Headlines
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.