Victims' Families Hope for Reevaluation of Barbour Pardons

Reported by: Shelley Orman
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 3/23/2012 7:09 pm
DESOTO COUNTY, MS (abc24.com) - Mississippi's Attorney General is asking the State Supreme Court to reconsider the decision to uphold former Governor Haley Barbour's controversial pardons. They include four convicted murderers, one of whom is Joseph Ozment from DeSoto County.

Attorney General Jim Hood is using a new argument, and victims' families hope it carries more weight. Last time the state argued the pardons weren't valid because inmates didn't publish enough notices in local newspapers.

This time, the Attorney General is arguing the victims' families weren't given enough notice. In fact, they weren't given any. He says that's illegal.

"They should have given us the time to speak our mind and at least try to change his mind. They didn't allow us anything," says Mary McAbee.

McAbee didn't find out Ozment, her brother's killer, was being pardoned until it was too late and Ozment was free.

"We should have had the right to say something, spoke to them. They denied us that," she tells abc24.com.

"From very beginning we were limited," says her husband Gerald McAbee.

The McAbees thought the battle was over when the state Supreme Court declared the pardons valid earlier this month.

"That was really a let down. We thought that was the end of it. That was all we were going to get," Mary McAbee says.

But now they have renewed hope with the Attorney General's new claim.

"I'm hoping the wording he's put in there might change their mind to at least hear it again," Mary McAbee says. "I don't want to give up. I want to keep on going whatever it takes because our rights have been violated. No matter how you look at it. They have been violated."

The State and the McAbees are waiting for a response from the court. The justices could turn down the motion.

Out of the nine Supreme Court justices, six support the pardons, three are against them.

If they do allow another hearing, two justices will have to change their mind to have a majority vote against the pardons.
Share
2 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of abc24 News

Golden Taint - 3/26/2012 3:23 PM
0 Votes
They need to let it go already. The men were legally freed and pardoned. These folks should focus their attention on the FUTURE instead of the past and work to correct the system so that politicians can't have the power to do these types of things in the future. I certainly don't agree with all the pardons, but it's spilled milk at this point.

SteveTapp - 3/24/2012 12:44 AM
0 Votes
What a Democrat hick whore, trying to undo the traditional American separation of powers to make his own dismal hick-ass career in Mississloppi.
More Headlines
AMBER ALERT: Gabriel Swaney
A Middle Tennessee AMBER Alert is being issued by the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation on the behalf of the Murfreesboro Police Department for 8 year-old Gabriel Swaney.
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.